Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest credited by the firm to an estate account, after the death of a partner, constituted payment to the partners so as to attract disallowance under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The administration of the estate had been completed and the recipient had assumed the character of a trustee. On the construction of the will, the bequest was to a class of grandsons existing at the testator's death, so future-born children had no entitlement. Although the firm had made a payment by crediting the amount to the estate account, section 40(b) applies only if the payment is to a partner. The minors had no accrued right to receive the interest during the accounting year because the will postponed enjoyment until the youngest attained majority. Following the principle that a minor with no present right to income does not derive taxable benefit, the credited interest could not be treated as payment to the partners.
Conclusion: Section 40(b) did not apply, as no income had accrued to the minor partners and the amount was not payment to a partner within the meaning of the provision.
Ratio Decidendi: Disallowance under section 40(b) requires a payment to a partner with an accrued right to receive it; where the recipient holds the amount as trustee and the beneficiary has no present enforceable right to the income, the provision is not attracted.