Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a proper construction of the will, the class of legatees comprised only the grandchildren in existence at the testator's death, so that the assessee's after-born sons were excluded from the assessment of the estate income.
Analysis: The bequest was to a class of grandchildren, and the governing principle under section 111 of the Indian Succession Act is that, unless the will defers possession of the property beyond the testator's death, the class is ascertained at the date of death. The will in question directed administration by the executors during the minorities of the legatees, but it did not postpone possession of the legacy until any legatee attained majority. The executors' management was only a mode of holding on behalf of the beneficiaries, not a deferment of vesting or possession. The exception to section 111 therefore did not apply.
Conclusion: The class of beneficiaries had to be determined as on the date of the testator's death, and the later-born sons were not entitled to share in the estate income. The assessment on Narayanan and Viswanathan on a half share each was valid.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a testamentary gift is to a class, and the will does not postpone possession of the property beyond the testator's death, the class is ascertained at the date of death under section 111 of the Indian Succession Act.