Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable when the assessees believed that they were not assessable as a body of individuals and, on that basis, did not file a return under section 139(1).
Analysis: The assessees' explanation was that they honestly believed that the cash amount did not constitute income of a body of individuals and that, therefore, no return was required to be filed in that status. The mere fact that the source of the amount was not satisfactorily explained for assessment purposes did not by itself justify penalty. For penalty under section 271(1)(a), the relevant question was whether there was reasonable cause for the failure to file the return in time. A bona fide belief that the assessees were not liable to be assessed as a body of individuals constituted reasonable cause.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable and the cancellation of penalty was upheld.