Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application of Section 13(b) of the Partnership Act to the partnership deed and the status of the firm under Section 183(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required fresh determination by the Assessing Officer.
Analysis: The matter had been sent back pursuant to the High Court's directions to record a clear finding on whether, after the reconstitution of the firm, there was any agreement specifying the ratio of sharing of profits and losses. The Tribunal noted that the earlier finding had not fully examined the vital question whether any subsequent agreement existed after the deed dated 16 September 1981. In view of the remand, the Tribunal declined to decide at that stage whether Section 13(b) applied where a minor was admitted to the benefits of the partnership, leaving all contentions open before the Assessing Officer.
Conclusion: The question of the applicability of Section 13(b) of the Partnership Act was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh finding, and the assessee was left free to raise all arguments on that issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the existence of a contract specifying profit and loss sharing is not conclusively examined, the matter must be remitted for a finding on the applicability of Section 13(b) of the Partnership Act rather than decided finally on appeal.