Registered partnership shares must follow the deed, while speculative losses cannot offset ordinary business profits.
For a registered firm under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Income-tax Officer must compute the firm's income and partners' shares in accordance with the registered partnership deed and cannot disregard the registered arrangement to assess those shares in the hands of Hindu undivided families; such a reallocation is beyond jurisdiction. On set-off, speculative losses could not be adjusted against profits from other business in the same assessment year under the provision applied, so the claim was disallowed. The discussion therefore notes partial relief on the jurisdictional issue but rejection of the set-off claim.
Issues: (i) Whether, in the assessment of a registered firm, the Income-tax Officer could disregard the registered partnership and assess the shares of partners and minors admitted to benefits of partnership in the hands of their respective Hindu undivided families. (ii) Whether speculative losses could be set off against profits from other business in the same assessment year.
Issue (i): Whether, in the assessment of a registered firm, the Income-tax Officer could disregard the registered partnership and assess the shares of partners and minors admitted to benefits of partnership in the hands of their respective Hindu undivided families.
Analysis: Under section 23(5) and section 23(6) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, once a firm is registered, the Income-tax Officer must determine the income of the firm and the shares of the partners in accordance with the registered deed of partnership. At that stage, he cannot conduct an inquiry into whether the partners are beneficially entitled to the shares on behalf of some other person or entity. The attempt to assess the allocated shares in the hands of the respective Hindu undivided families was therefore beyond jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The assessment direction was without jurisdiction and was rightly set aside; the finding was in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether speculative losses could be set off against profits from other business in the same assessment year.
Analysis: The claim for set-off was governed by the earlier decision that had been overruled. On the applicable law under section 10(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, speculative losses could not be set off against profits from other business activities of the same year.
Conclusion: The set-off was not allowable and the finding was in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the set-off issue and failed on the jurisdiction issue, leaving the assessee with only partial relief.
Ratio Decidendi: In the case of a registered firm, the Income-tax Officer must assess the partners' shares in accordance with the registered partnership deed and cannot reallocate them to third-party owners, while speculative losses are not deductible against ordinary business profits under the provision applied.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
