Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for an incorrect totalling of purchases, or whether the mistake was bona fide and did not amount to concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars.
Analysis: The discrepancy in the purchase totals was treated as a clerical or arithmetical mistake. The record did not show any mala fide intent, contumacious conduct, or deliberate suppression of income. It was also noted that no balance sheet had been prepared and filed for the relevant year, weakening the inference that the error must have been detected as intentional during preparation of accounts.
Conclusion: Penalty was not warranted under section 271(1)(c), and the cancellation of penalty was upheld in favour of the assessee.