TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Income Tax Appeals Success: Loans Excluded, Land Valuation Upheld</h1> <h3>Haridhan Singh. Versus Wealth-Tax Officer</h3> Haridhan Singh. Versus Wealth-Tax Officer - ITD 017, 1027, TTJ 019, 190, Issues:1. Inclusion of loans given by late Ardaman Singh to his daughter and son-in-law in the net wealth of the assessee.2. Treatment of the loan amount advanced to Delhi Land & Finance Co. Ltd. by Ardaman Singh.3. Valuation of agricultural land in villages Rounta and Talwandi for wealth-tax purposes.Analysis:Issue 1:The appeals were directed against orders made by the AAC relating to assessment years 1969-70 to 1975-76. Late Ardaman Singh had advanced loans to his daughter and son-in-law without any formal documentation. The loans became irrecoverable due to the expiration of the limitation period. The WTO included these amounts in the net wealth, citing that the Limitation Act did not apply. However, the ITAT held that lack of action for recovery cannot justify inclusion in the net wealth, as the loans were hit by limitation. The loans were excluded from the net wealth for the relevant assessment years.Issue 2:Ardaman Singh had advanced a sum to Delhi Land & Finance Co. Ltd. for a land purchase, which was not repaid. The ITAT found that the loan was hit by limitation and the company was defunct. The absence of documentary evidence was deemed irrelevant in this context. The loan amount was excluded from the net wealth for the assessment years 1971-72 to 1975-76.Issue 3:The valuation of agricultural land in villages Rounta and Talwandi was contested. The assessee argued that the land in village Rounta, being in adverse possession, should have a nil value. However, the AAC confirmed the valuation. The ITAT upheld the valuation, noting that the assessee had accepted the same value in a previous assessment year. The addition of the land's value in the net wealth was confirmed for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76.In conclusion, the ITAT allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1969-70 to 1973-74 in full and for the years 1974-75 and 1975-76 in part.
TaxTMI 