Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the house rent allowance of Rs. 36,000 received by the assessee as Chairman of the Advisory Board constituted under the National Security Act, 1980 was taxable in his hands.
Analysis: The appointment notifications showed that the assessee, though a retired Judge, was entitled as Chairman of the Advisory Board to the same salary and allowances as a sitting Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, with subsequent modifications keeping the office at par with that of a sitting Judge. Article 22 of the Constitution of India and Section 9-A of the National Security Act, 1980 required the Advisory Board to consist of persons who are or have been Judges of a High Court, and the Chairman to be one who is or has been a Judge. The definition of "Judge" in Section 2(1)(g) of the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 was broad enough to include a Judge of a High Court without drawing a distinction between sitting and retired Judges. In this setting, the allowance claimed was linked to the office held and the benefits attached to it, and the assessee was to be treated on par with a sitting High Court Judge for the purpose of the exemption.
Conclusion: The house rent allowance was not taxable and the assessee was entitled to the exemption claimed.