Capital loss from share sale allowed to set off against capital gains for 1986-87

The Appellate Tribunal allowed the capital loss arising from the sale of shares to be set off against capital gains for the assessment year 1986-87. The Tribunal found no evidence of sham transactions or collusion, emphasizing the genuineness of the sale. It held that legitimate tax planning within the legal framework was permissible, citing relevant legal precedents. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision directing the Income Tax Officer to permit the set off of the capital loss against capital gains, dismissing the revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Allowance of capital loss arising from the sale of shares for set off against capital gains.

Analysis:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT CALCUTTA-E concerned the allowance of a capital loss of Rs. 36,43,221 arising from the sale of shares for set off against capital gains for the assessment year 1986-87. The assessee had sold a flat in Bombay resulting in a capital gain of Rs. 35,70,661 and subsequently sold equity shares of two companies. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed the capital loss claim, invoking the doctrine in McDowell & Co. Ltd. v. CTO [1985] 154 ITR 148 (SC), alleging the sale was a colorable device to avoid tax. However, the CIT(A) allowed the claim, stating there was no evidence of collusion between the assessee and the broker, and the transaction was genuine. The revenue appealed, arguing the CIT(A) should have upheld the ITO's view.

The Tribunal held that there was no evidence to suggest the sale of shares was sham or a make-belief transaction. The CIT(A) found no collusion between the assessee and the broker. The Tribunal emphasized that the transaction was genuine, and there was no basis to disallow the set off of capital loss against capital gains. It was noted that the shares were not high-value investments, and the timing of the sale did not automatically make it a tax avoidance scheme. Referring to legal precedents, including M.V. Valliappan v. ITO [1988] 170 ITR 238 and Union of India v. Playworld Electronics (P.) Ltd. [1990] 184 ITR 308, the Tribunal concluded that legitimate tax planning within the framework of the law was permissible. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order directing the ITO to allow the set off of the capital loss against capital gains.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming the decision to allow the capital loss arising from the sale of shares to be set off against the capital gains.

---