Additional evidence before Tribunal may be admitted where needed for substantial justice and fresh disposal of the dispute.

Procedural restrictions on additional evidence before the Tribunal do not bar consideration of relevant material arising from the same subject matter when admission is necessary for substantial justice. Where the appellate authority has not dealt with all grounds and fairness requires both sides to be heard on new departmental material that emerged after the first appellate order, the Tribunal may admit the material, set aside the earlier order, and remit the matter for fresh disposal. The dispute is then reheard with adequate opportunity to the parties and consideration of all grounds.

---

---

Issues: Whether additional material not produced before the first appellate authority could be taken on record by the Tribunal, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration after taking such material into account.

Analysis: The dispute before the Tribunal remained the same, and the Departmental report relied upon by the assessee had come into existence after the appellate order of the first authority. The Tribunal held that the bar on additional evidence under the Tribunal Rules is procedural and does not prevent consideration of material necessary for proper disposal of the appeal, particularly where the material relates to the same subject matter and is required to advance substantial justice. The Tribunal also noted that the earlier appellate authority had not dealt with all the grounds raised by the assessee and that fairness required the parties to be heard on the new departmental material.

Conclusion: The report was admitted, the appellate order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal after considering all grounds and granting adequate opportunity to both sides.

Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained a remand for rehearing on the disputed wealth-tax valuation issue, with the appeal treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Ratio Decidendi: Procedural restrictions on additional evidence do not bar the Tribunal from considering relevant material arising from the same subject matter where its admission is necessary to secure substantial justice in the appeal.

---