Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in an assessment made under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Income-tax Officer could estimate agricultural income and disturb the income returned by the assessee, and whether such an error could be rectified under section 154 rather than by resort to section 143(2)(a).
Analysis: The assessment under section 143(1) permits only the limited adjustments specifically authorised by that provision. The Income-tax Officer has no authority to go beyond it by estimating income under a head returned by the assessee or by altering the quantum of income disclosed. Such an act is outside the scope of section 143(1) and constitutes a mistake apparent from the record. Section 143(2)(a) is relevant only where the assessment remains within the framework of section 143(1); where the officer travels beyond that provision, the assessee may invoke section 154.
Conclusion: The assessment was liable to be rectified by substituting the agricultural income as returned by the assessee, and the assessee succeeded.