Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the restrictions in sections 9 and 10 of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income & Wealth Ordinance, 1975 barred set-off of losses and refund of tax where the disclosure was made under section 14(1).
Analysis: The disclosure made under section 14(1) was treated as a distinct statutory mechanism from disclosure under section 3(1). The scheme of the enactment showed that the bar on reopening assessments, claiming set-off, or obtaining refund was directed to disclosures under the earlier provisions and not to declarations made under section 14. Section 14 itself, being subject to its own provisions, and section 14(6) providing for credit of tax paid in the consequential assessment, indicated that the ordinary provisions of the income-tax and wealth-tax laws would continue to operate unless expressly excluded. On that construction, sections 9 and 10 did not prevent the assessee from claiming refund if, on the final determination of the firm's assessment, such refund otherwise became due.
Conclusion: The restrictions in sections 9 and 10 did not bar the assessee's claim to set-off or refund in relation to a declaration made under section 14(1), and the assessee succeeded to that extent.