Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods cleared by an SSI unit under the composite mark "AIDEES NEWALL" were hit by the bar in para-4 of SSI Notification No. 1/93-CE because the mark contained the pre-existing brand name "NEWALL" belonging to another person, thereby denying SSI exemption and sustaining duty and penalty.
Analysis: Explanation IX to the notification defines "brand name" or "trade name" broadly to include any name or mark used so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the goods and some person using that name or mark. The composite expression retained the essential and identifiable part "NEWALL", which was admittedly the collaborator's brand name. Adding the assessee's own word did not remove the trade connection created by the pre-existing mark. On the same principle applied in the cited apex court decisions, the branded goods remained goods bearing another person's brand name for the purpose of the notification.
Conclusion: The clearances were ineligible for SSI exemption, the duty demand was sustainable, and the penalty was justified.
Final Conclusion: The appeal filed by the department succeeded and the order in favour of the assessee was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: For SSI exemption under the notification, a composite mark that retains an identifiable pre-existing brand name of another person will still be treated as use of that other person's brand name if it indicates a connection in the course of trade.