Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1982 (3) TMI 108 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tenancy rights end upon property purchase, capital gains computed at acquisition cost. Appeal dismissed. The tenancy rights of the assessee-firm were deemed to have ended upon purchasing the property on 16-2-1973, with the majority view holding that the cost ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tenancy rights end upon property purchase, capital gains computed at acquisition cost. Appeal dismissed.

                          The tenancy rights of the assessee-firm were deemed to have ended upon purchasing the property on 16-2-1973, with the majority view holding that the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains should be Rs. 21,806, without factoring in the value of tenancy rights as on 1-1-1954. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the tenancy rights of the assessee-firm came to an end when it purchased the property on 16-2-1973.
                          2. Whether the cost of acquisition of the tenancy rights as on 1-1-1954 is to be deducted while computing the capital gains arising on the sale of the property on 14-3-1974.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Whether the tenancy rights of the assessee-firm came to an end when it purchased the property on 16-2-1973:

                          The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture and sale of rubber balloons, was a tenant of a factory premises since 1945. On 16-2-1973, the assessee purchased the property for Rs. 21,806. The assessee sold the property on 14-3-1974 for Rs. 80,000. The primary contention was whether the tenancy rights, which existed prior to the purchase, ceased to exist upon the purchase of the property.

                          The Income Tax Officer (ITO) and the Commissioner (Appeals) both held that the tenancy rights merged with the ownership rights upon purchase, and thus, the tenancy rights ceased to exist. The ITO stated, "the assessee could not be regarded both as a tenant as well as an owner at the same time." The Commissioner (Appeals) concurred, noting, "the assessee was not the owner of the property as on 1-1-1954."

                          However, the Accountant Member argued that the tenancy rights were an independent capital asset acquired before 1-1-1954 and did not extinguish upon purchase. He stated, "the assessee had an independent capital asset in the form of the tenancy rights which it acquired without payment of cash prior to 1-1-1954."

                          The Judicial Member disagreed, asserting that the tenancy rights ended when the property was purchased. He emphasized, "when the assessee-firm purchased the property on 16-2-1973, its tenancy right came to an end."

                          The Third Member, agreeing with the Judicial Member, concluded, "the tenancy rights of the assessee-firm came to an end when it purchased the property on 16-2-1973."

                          2. Whether the cost of acquisition of the tenancy rights as on 1-1-1954 is to be deducted while computing the capital gains arising on the sale of the property on 14-3-1974:

                          The assessee argued that the cost of acquisition should include the value of tenancy rights as on 1-1-1954, estimated at Rs. 41,680. The ITO rejected this, stating that the tenancy rights merged with the ownership rights upon purchase, and thus, the cost of acquisition should only be Rs. 21,806. The ITO calculated the capital gains as Rs. 52,594 and treated it as short-term capital gains.

                          The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the ITO's decision, stating, "only the sum of Rs. 21,608 could be taken as the cost of acquisition of the asset."

                          The Accountant Member proposed that the cost of acquisition should consider both the tenancy rights and the ownership rights. He suggested bifurcating the sale proceeds into two components: one for the tenancy rights and the other for the ownership rights. He stated, "the capital gains arising out of the transaction in this case... has to be calculated by bifurcating the sale proceeds."

                          The Judicial Member disagreed, asserting that the cost of acquisition should only be Rs. 21,806. He stated, "the cost of the property which was sold on 14-3-1974 amounts to Rs. 21,806 only and the capital gains tax has to be charged on this basis."

                          The Third Member, agreeing with the Judicial Member, concluded, "the cost of acquisition of the tenancy rights as on 1-1-1954 is to be deducted while computing the capital gains arising on the sale of the property on 14-3-1974."

                          Conclusion:

                          The majority view held that the tenancy rights of the assessee-firm ceased upon the purchase of the property on 16-2-1973, and the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains should be Rs. 21,806, without considering the value of tenancy rights as on 1-1-1954. The appeal was thus dismissed, confirming the orders of the lower authorities.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found