Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the employer was liable under section 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for short deduction of tax at source after granting exemption under section 10(10B) to compensation paid under a Voluntary Separation Scheme.
Analysis: The compensation was paid to employees who were stated to have been engaged in manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work and none was shown to be employed mainly in managerial or administrative capacity. The Tribunal noted that the expression "workman" in section 10(10B) has to be read with section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and that compensation under a voluntary separation arrangement may amount to retrenchment on the facts of a given case. It further held that the employer's obligation under section 192 is to make an honest and fair estimate of salary income and that section 201 applies only where short deduction is shown to be without bona fide basis. On the materials, no contrary finding displaced the assessee's view that the exemption could be treated as applicable when making the estimate.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to be treated as an assessee in default under section 201 for the impugned short deduction, and the tax demand was directed to be deleted.