Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for computing the principal value of the Hindu undivided family property under section 39 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, the deeming provisions relating to property 'deemed to pass' could be invoked so as to include gifts made within the statutory period.
Analysis: Section 39 is concerned with the valuation of interest in coparcenary property ceasing on death. Sub-sections (1) and (2) determine the share that would have been allotted on a notional partition, and sub-section (3) creates a legal fiction only for estimating the principal value of the joint family property. That fiction is confined to valuation and cannot be extended to provisions which deem property to pass, since such provisions operate in a different part of the Act and deal with the actual inclusion of property passing or deemed to pass on death. The fiction therefore does not permit inclusion of gifts made by the HUF for the limited purpose of valuation under section 39.
Conclusion: The deeming provisions relating to property deemed to pass were not applicable for computing the principal value of the HUF property, and the inclusion of the gift was rightly deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: A legal fiction created for valuation under section 39 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 must be confined to estimating the principal value of coparcenary property and cannot be extended to deeming provisions that treat property as passing on death.