Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether damages and interest recovered under section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Funds Act, 1952 for delayed remittance of provident fund contributions are admissible as business expenditure.
Analysis: The liability under section 14B was held to arise from a specific order of the competent authority for default in timely payment of provident fund dues. The reasoning distinguished such damages from interest that accrues automatically under a statute and noted that the amount imposed under section 14B could include both compensatory and penal elements. Following the principle that such statutory damages constitute a civil sanction for infringement of the law, and relying on the view that no contrary authority had displaced the relevant precedent, the interest component of the damages was treated as not deductible.
Conclusion: The claim for deduction of the interest component of the section 14B damages was rejected and decided against the assessee.