Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the valuation of the unquoted shares gifted by the assessee was to be accepted on the basis of the approved valuer's report, and whether recourse to Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules was justified in the circumstances.
Analysis: The approved valuer had examined the nature of the company's business, the principles of valuation, and the relevant balance-sheet data before arriving at the share value. The revenue did not show any valid reason to reject that report, nor had it referred the valuation to the Valuation Officer under the enabling provision. The legal position applied was that Rule 1D prescribing the break-up method for unquoted shares is directory and not mandatory, and that valuation must reflect the fair market value on the date of gift. In the absence of material to displace the assessee's valuation, the higher break-up valuation adopted by the Gift-tax Officer was not justified.
Conclusion: The approved valuer's valuation was rightly accepted, and the assessee succeeded on the valuation issue.
Ratio Decidendi: For unquoted shares, the break-up method under Rule 1D is not compulsory, and where an approved valuer's report is reasoned and unchallenged by valid material, it may be accepted unless the revenue lawfully displaces it by reference to the valuation machinery provided by the statute.