Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment under section 8(b) of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 was invalid because the notice was served after the statutory time-limit, and whether limitation under that provision turns on service of notice rather than mere issuance.
Analysis: Section 8(b) expressly requires the Income-tax Officer to serve on the assessee a notice within four years of the end of the relevant assessment year. The provision was treated as analogous to section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, rather than to section 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that construction, limitation is satisfied only when the notice is served within time. Although the notice had been issued before the deadline, it was actually served after the due date.
Conclusion: The notice was not validly served within the prescribed time-limit, and the reassessment based on that notice was liable to be set aside in favour of the assessee.