Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a loss arising from a hedging transaction in shares entered into by an investor to guard against price fluctuations is excluded from the category of speculative transactions under section 43(5)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and therefore allowable for set-off.
Analysis: Section 43(5)(b) applies to a contract in respect of stocks and shares entered into by a dealer or investor to guard against loss in holdings through price fluctuations. The provision speaks of such a contract and does not require the assessee to be regularly engaged in hedging transactions. It also draws no distinction between stock-in-trade held by a dealer and shares held as investment. A hedging transaction of this kind is not speculative merely because the assessee is an investor rather than a dealer, and the resulting loss falls outside the speculative transaction category.
Conclusion: The hedging loss was not speculative in nature and was allowable to be taken into account for deduction or set-off; the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.