Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of section 41(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the entire compensation arising from acquisition of the buses was chargeable in the year in which compensation was determined, or only the instalments that had actually become due in the relevant previous year.
Analysis: Section 41(2) taxes the excess on the basis of the year in which the monies payable for the asset became due. The acquisition statute provided for payment of compensation in annual instalments in cases exceeding the prescribed limit, and the instalments were not payable before their respective due dates. On that construction, the determination of compensation did not make the whole amount due at once. The expression "money payable" was treated as distinct from "money due" in the statutory context, and only the instalments falling due in the relevant year could be brought to charge. Practical difficulty in computing the profit could not justify a wider reading of the charging provision.
Conclusion: Only the instalments due on the relevant due date in the assessment year under consideration were taxable under section 41(2); the addition of the entire compensation was unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.