Tax Tribunal Deletes Additions Based on Conjectures, Accepts Audited Rice Mill Records, Partly Modifies Yield and By-product Estimates

The ITAT Amritsar Special Bench disposed of multiple revenue appeals concerning a rice mill assessee by largely allowing the assessee's claims. Preliminary objections to representation and constitution of the Special Bench were rejected as unsubstantial. On merits, the Bench held that the AO's upward revision of closing stock value, additions on account of rice bran, rice yield, and khudi phak were based on conjectures and lacked evidentiary support, especially in light of regularly maintained and audited books and statutory records. These additions were deleted. In the case of a connected assessee, the Bench partly modified the AO's estimates, directing recomputation of addition with lower yield and rate for khudi phak.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Preliminary objections regarding the appointment of representatives and constitution of the Special Bench.
2. Valuation of closing stock.
3. Addition on account of Rice Bran.
4. Yield of rice.
5. Addition on account of khudi phak.

Summary:

1. Preliminary objections:
The assessee raised a preliminary objection to the appointment of Shri Rakesh Goel, Jr. Departmental Representative, which was not pressed after some submissions. Similarly, Shri Rakesh Goel raised an objection to the constitution of the Special Bench but failed to substantiate it. The issue was settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in ITAT v. Dy. CIT [1996] 218 ITR 275.

2. Valuation of closing stock:
The Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the assessee had shown a rate of Rs. 70.15 per qtl., while other assessees showed higher values. The AO adopted a value of Rs. 75 per qtl., resulting in an addition of Rs. 25,100. The Special Bench found no valid basis for this addition and deleted it.

3. Addition on account of Rice Bran:
The AO noted that the yield shown was less than 5% of the rice procured and made an addition of Rs. 1,872. The Special Bench found the addition to be without basis and deleted it.

4. Yield of rice:
The AO applied proviso to section 145(1) on the ground that the correct profits could not be deduced from the books of account maintained. The AO applied a yield of 65.66%, resulting in an addition of Rs. 1,31,054. The Special Bench found that the AO's reasons were not valid and based on surmises and conjectures. The Bench emphasized that the assessee maintained regular books of account, statutory registers, and that these were audited and checked by State authorities. The Special Bench deleted the addition, stating that there was no material to show that the yield was higher than stated or that there were sales outside the books.

5. Addition on account of khudi phak:
The AO applied a yield of 2% without any basis, resulting in an addition. The Special Bench noted that in the case of M/s. Singla Rice Mills, the yield of phak was adopted at 1%. The Bench found no valid basis for the AO's addition and deleted it.

M/s. Guru Nanak Rice Mills:
The AO adopted a yield of khudi phak at 3% and applied a rate of Rs. 100 per qtl., resulting in an addition of Rs. 1,06,739. The Special Bench found that it would be fair to adopt a yield of 2% and a rate of Rs. 79 per qtl. The AO was directed to recompute the addition accordingly.

Conclusion:
The appeals were allowed in favor of the assessees, and the additions made by the AO were deleted or adjusted as per the directions of the Special Bench.

---