Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of the 57,000 shares distributed among members under a court decree on partial partition could be included in the assessee HUF's wealth assessments, and whether section 20 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 applied to such partial partition.
Analysis: The assessment turned on whether the partition of only one asset, while the HUF continued to exist in respect of other properties, amounted to a partition attracting section 20. The Tribunal applied the settled distinction between complete and partial partition and held that section 20, being in pari materia with section 25A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, dealt only with cases where the joint family status was severed by a partition. It relied on the principle that a partial partition does not involve severance of the status of jointness and therefore falls outside section 20. It further noted that section 20A, introduced later, had no application because the partial partition in question had taken place long before the relevant cut-off date. On the valuation dates, the shares had already ceased to belong to the assessee HUF.
Conclusion: Section 20 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 did not apply to the partial partition in question, and the value of the shares could not be included in the assessee's assessments.