Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to immunity from penalty under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Ordinance, 1975, despite not filing the wealth-tax return along with the disclosure and not producing a certificate of acceptance from the Commissioner of Wealth-tax.
Analysis: Immunity under section 15(1) of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Ordinance, 1975 depends on a valid disclosure and compliance with the attendant requirements. The absence of the return filed with the disclosure under rule 5(2) of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Rules, 1975 was held not to be a condition that by itself defeats immunity. The decisive consideration was whether the disclosure had been accepted. The assessee had paid the wealth-tax on the disclosed wealth and complied with the other formalities. The departmental delay and failure to secure or issue the acceptance certificate could not be put against the assessee.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to immunity from penalty, and the penalty under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was cancelled.
Ratio Decidendi: Immunity under a voluntary disclosure scheme cannot be denied merely for non-filing of the return with the disclosure or for want of a departmental acceptance certificate, if the disclosure is otherwise valid and accepted.