Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1999 (4) TMI 105 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Dismissed Revenue's appeals, upholding cancellation of penalties under section 271C for bona fide non-deduction reasons. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to cancel penalties under section 271C. It found that the respondents had a ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Dismissed Revenue's appeals, upholding cancellation of penalties under section 271C for bona fide non-deduction reasons.

                          The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to cancel penalties under section 271C. It found that the respondents had a bona fide belief and reasonable cause for not deducting and paying tax due to pending exemption petitions under section 194H(2). The respondents' actions were deemed diligent and compliant with statutory provisions, exempting them from penalties under section 271C as per section 273B.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Imposition of penalties under section 271C of the Income Tax Act for failure to deduct and pay tax at source as required by section 194H.
                          2. Whether the respondents had a bona fide belief that they were not required to deduct tax at source during the pendency of their exemption petitions under section 194H(2).
                          3. Whether the respondents' actions constituted reasonable cause under section 273B, thereby exempting them from penalties under section 271C.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Imposition of Penalties Under Section 271C
                          The common issue in all appeals was the imposition of penalties under section 271C of the Income Tax Act for failing to deduct and pay tax at source as mandated by section 194H. The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in canceling the penalties despite clear provisions under section 271C that mandate penalties for such failures. The respondents argued that they had filed petitions for exemption under section 194H(2) and believed they were not required to deduct tax at source during the pendency of these petitions.

                          Issue 2: Bona Fide Belief of Non-liability During Pendency of Exemption Petitions
                          The respondents filed petitions for exemption on 4th November 1991, which were decided by the CBDT only after the Allahabad High Court's directions on 23rd July 1992. The respondents deducted tax on 27th October 1992 and deposited it on 29th October 1992. They argued that they had a bona fide belief that they were not required to deduct tax during the pendency of their petitions, which was a reasonable cause under section 273B.

                          Issue 3: Reasonable Cause Under Section 273B
                          The CIT(A) accepted the respondents' argument, noting that the respondents had exercised their statutory right to seek exemption and had acted diligently throughout the process. The CIT(A) found that the delay in deducting and paying tax was due to the pendency of their exemption petitions and not due to any negligence or inaction. The Tribunal agreed, stating that the respondents had a reasonable cause for their failure to deduct and pay tax at source, thus satisfying the requirements of section 273B.

                          Tribunal's Findings:
                          1. Statutory Right and Fair Play: The Tribunal emphasized that the respondents had a statutory right under section 194H(2) to seek exemption from the obligation to deduct tax. The CBDT's delay in deciding the petitions constituted a reasonable cause for the respondents' failure to deduct tax.

                          2. Bona Fide Belief: The Tribunal found that the respondents' belief that they were not required to deduct tax during the pendency of their petitions was bona fide and reasonable. The respondents acted diligently by filing their petitions promptly and approaching the High Court when the CBDT delayed its decision.

                          3. Reasonable Cause Under Section 273B: The Tribunal concluded that the respondents had established a reasonable cause for their failure to deduct and pay tax at source, as required under section 273B. The respondents' actions were not negligent or mala fide, and they complied with the tax deduction requirement promptly after the CBDT's decision.

                          4. Confirmation of CIT(A)'s Order: The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order canceling the penalties, noting that the respondents had acted in good faith and had a reasonable cause for their actions.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to cancel the penalties under section 271C. The Tribunal found that the respondents had a bona fide belief and reasonable cause for their failure to deduct and pay tax at source due to the pendency of their exemption petitions under section 194H(2). The respondents' actions were diligent and in compliance with the statutory provisions, thereby exempting them from penalties under section 271C as per section 273B.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found