Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the remuneration received by foreign technicians deputed to an Indian project was exempt from Indian income-tax under section 10(6)(vi), and whether the double taxation agreement between India and Japan also protected such remuneration from tax in India.
Analysis: The technicians remained employees of the foreign enterprise under the technical assistance arrangement, which showed that their services were only lent to the Indian company for the project. The remuneration paid by the Indian company was treated as income of the foreign employer and taxed in its hands under section 115A. The conditions for exemption under section 10(6)(vi) were held to be satisfied, and section 10(6)(viia) was held inapplicable. Article VII of the India-Japan double taxation agreement also supported exemption, since the technicians were present in India for less than the prescribed period and the remuneration was not deductible in computing the profits of an enterprise chargeable to tax in India.
Conclusion: The remuneration received by the foreign technicians was not taxable in India and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where foreign technicians remain employees of a foreign enterprise and the statutory and treaty conditions for exemption are satisfied, their remuneration for a limited stay in India is not chargeable to Indian income-tax.