Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeals were maintainable when the tax effect in each appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular and whether such circular was binding on the Revenue.
Analysis: The CBDT had issued successive instructions prescribing monetary limits for departmental appeals, including Instruction No. 1979 dated 27 March 2000, which fixed a limit of Rs. 1,00,000 for appeals before the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the Revenue was bound by the circular and could not file appeals contrary to it. Relying on the binding nature of CBDT instructions and the principle that the Revenue cannot advance or maintain proceedings contrary to such circulars, the Tribunal concluded that the appeals had been filed in violation of the monetary-limit instruction.
Conclusion: The Revenue's appeals were not maintainable and were dismissed in limine.
Final Conclusion: The low tax effect and the binding CBDT instruction prevented the Revenue from pursuing the appeals, resulting in dismissal at the threshold.