Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the reassessment under Section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid; and (ii) whether the bank guarantee commission was allowable as revenue expenditure.
Issue (i): Whether the reassessment under Section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid.
Analysis: The assessment had been reopened to include an amount earlier allowed towards betterment tax. The record showed escapement of income, and the reopening was based on material justifying action under the reassessment provision.
Conclusion: The reopening was upheld, against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the bank guarantee commission was allowable as revenue expenditure.
Analysis: The machinery had already passed to the assessee and the instalment payments were facilitated through bank discounting of usance bills. The commission was incurred for financial assistance in the ordinary course of the running business and was not part of the cost of acquisition of the machinery.
Conclusion: The bank guarantee commission was allowable as revenue expenditure, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment was sustained, but the disallowance of bank guarantee commission was deleted, resulting in a partly allowed appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a payment is made for banking accommodation or financial facility in the course of a running business and is not intrinsically connected with the acquisition cost of an asset, it is revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure.