TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal grants appeal, corrects Boric Acid classification, underscores importance of accurate customs classification</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and granting consequential reliefs to the appellants. The Boric Acid was classified ... Boric acid with addition of anti-caking agents, capable of killing cockroaches Issues:Classification of imported Boric Acid under Customs Tariff Heading, applicability of Circular No. 61/2004, eligibility for clearance under DFRC Scheme, interpretation of Customs Tariff Rules, relevance of Board Circular, justification for classification under Heading 38.08, reliance on HSN Explanatory Notes, consideration of end-use certificate, appeal against Order-in-Appeal.Analysis:The appellants contested the classification of imported Boric Acid under Heading 38.08 of the Customs Tariff, citing their import under a DFRC license for leather products. They argued that the Boric Acid was not related to insecticides or pesticides, as per Circular No. 61/2004, and should be classified under Heading 28.10 due to its specific description. They relied on various legal precedents to support their claim, emphasizing the importance of specific descriptions in classification.The authorities below upheld the classification under Heading 38.08 based on the Board Circular, requiring registration with CIB and RC. However, the appellants presented evidence from technical sources highlighting the multi-faceted uses of Boric Acid beyond insecticides, supporting their classification argument under Heading 28.10. They also challenged the necessity of an end-use certificate for clearance.The Tribunal analyzed the HSN Explanatory Notes, technical properties of Boric Acid, and legal principles governing tariff interpretation. They concluded that the Boric Acid imported by the appellants did not qualify as an insecticide under Heading 38.08 but should be classified under Heading 28.10. The Tribunal criticized the authorities for not considering the contentions properly, leading to an erroneous classification and subsequent penalties.In light of the evidence and legal interpretations, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and granting consequential reliefs to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate classification based on specific descriptions and proper consideration of all relevant factors in customs disputes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
