Tariff classification of boric acid turned on heading terms, not end-use; no insecticide registration was required on the proved facts.

Boric acid imported for non-insecticidal use was classifiable under Heading 28.10, because tariff classification must follow the heading terms and relevant notes, not end-use alone. The record did not establish that the goods were imported as an insecticide, and the materials showed that registration under the Insecticides Act, 1968 was relevant only where insecticidal use was proved. The later permit condition introduced from 7.4.2006 did not apply to the import in question. Confiscation and penalty were therefore unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether boric acid imported by the appellant was classifiable under Heading 28.10 as a freely importable item, or under Heading 38.08 as an insecticide requiring registration and an end-use certificate under the Insecticides Act, 1968.

Analysis: The imported goods were specifically described in the ITC (HS) under Heading 2810, and the HSN Explanatory Notes supported classification under Chapter 28. The decision emphasised that tariff classification must follow the terms of the heading and the relevant notes, and not the end-use alone. Boric acid may be capable of insecticidal use in some circumstances, but the record did not establish that the imported material was for insecticidal purposes. The departmental material also showed that boric acid imported for non-insecticidal use was exempt from registration, while registration was relevant only where insecticidal use was shown. The later amendment adding a permit condition took effect only from 7.4.2006 and did not govern the import in question.

Conclusion: Boric acid was held to fall under Heading 28.10 and not Heading 38.08, and no registration under the Insecticides Act, 1968 was required on the facts proved. Confiscation and penalty were unsustainable.

---