Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty and interest were leviable on the assessee in respect of the amount reversed under Rule 57CC, having regard to the absence of suppression of facts and the retrospective amendment introduced by Clause 82 of the Finance Act, 2005.
Analysis: The amount required to be reversed under Rule 57CC had already been paid by the assessee, and the Tribunal noted that the earlier position, as recognised in precedent, was that such amount was not recoverable as duty under Section 11A or under Rule 57I(1). The subsequent retrospective amendment under Clause 82 of the Finance Act, 2005 enabled recovery of the amount, but the Explanation preserved the principle that an omission which was not punishable earlier could not be treated as an offence for the purpose of penalty. The record disclosed no fraud, wilful misstatement, collusion, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty. The assessee was also a PSU and had already reversed the credit amount, leaving no basis to sustain penal consequences or interest.
Conclusion: Penalty and interest were not leviable and were set aside.