Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty and interest were leviable on the amount equivalent to 8% of the value of exempted goods cleared under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, when the assessee had already paid the said amount and the provision was later retrospectively amended by the Finance Act, 2005.
Analysis: The assessee had used common inputs for dutiable and exempted goods without maintaining separate accounts and had paid the 8% amount demanded. The dispute was confined to penalty and interest. The retrospective amendments introduced by clauses 82 and 83 of the Finance Act, 2005 were treated as curing the recovery mechanism, and the earlier Division Bench view was followed to hold that, in the facts of the case, penalty and interest were not warranted once the amount had been reversed/paid. The confirmation of the principal duty-related amount was not disturbed.
Conclusion: Penalty and interest were set aside, while the confirmation of the duty-related amount was maintained; the assessee succeeded only in part.