Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for income-tax purposes, the Hindu undivided family could be treated as disrupted and its income split between the family and the adopted son merely because the widow's limited interest had become absolute under section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, without an inquiry and finding of partition under section 171 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 171(1) of the Income-tax Act creates a deeming fiction that a Hindu undivided family assessed as undivided continues to be so treated unless and until a finding of partition is recorded under the Act. Before such a finding, the Department must inquire into whether there has been a total or partial partition and determine the date of partition. The absence of any such inquiry or recorded finding meant that, in the eye of income-tax law, no partition had been established. The fact that the widow's interest had become absolute under the Hindu Succession Act did not by itself displace the statutory scheme of section 171, and the prior assessments in a different manner could not override the legal requirement of a recorded finding of partition.
Conclusion: The income remained assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family as undivided, and the Revenue's view was correct.