Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was leviable on duty paid belatedly under Rule 173G(1)(d) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 2001/2002, and whether Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 governed the demand.
Analysis: The interest provisions in Rule 173G(1)(d) and Rule 8 were held to be mandatory and self-contained. They did not depend on Section 11AB. On the facts, the assessee had itself worked out and paid duty late, resulting in a short payment and later payment of the differential amount beyond the due date. As the case did not involve the elements required for Section 11AB, that provision was held inapplicable, but the delay still attracted interest under the relevant excise rules.
Conclusion: Interest was leviable under the applicable rules, and the assessee's objection based on Section 11AB failed.