Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on asbestos packing and slat used in relation to the assessee's manufacturing activity.
Analysis: The eligibility of asbestos packing had already been settled in favour of the assessee by a prior Tribunal decision. As regards slat, it was treated as part of the cane carrier, which is a machine used in the sugar industry, and the Board's circular clarified that all parts of such a machine are eligible for Modvat credit irrespective of classification. On this basis, the impugned contrary view could not stand.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on both asbestos packing and slat, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an item is covered by settled Tribunal precedent or is established as a part of machinery whose parts are eligible for credit under a binding departmental clarification, Modvat credit cannot be denied on a contrary classification view.