Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether paper tubes manufactured and cleared by the assessee were classifiable under SH No. 4822.00 or under SH No. 4823.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule.
Analysis: The same product had already been classified under Heading 48.22 in an earlier appellate order, and that classification had attained finality as it was accepted by the Revenue. In view of the earlier final classification, the impugned classification under SH No. 4823.90 could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Paper tubes were held classifiable under SH No. 4822.00 and not under SH No. 4823.90.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an earlier classification of the same product under the tariff heading has attained finality and is accepted by the Revenue, a contrary classification of the same goods cannot be sustained without a valid basis.