Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to take suo motu credit of excess duty paid without prior permission or separate intimation to the Department.
Analysis: The excess duty had admittedly been paid at the time of clearance and was reflected in RT-12 returns which were duly assessed. The record also contained a certificate issued by the Central Excise Officer. In these circumstances, the excess payment was already within the Department's knowledge, and the assessee was not barred by law from taking credit of the amount in its records. Rule 173-I(4) and the Board's Circular relied upon by the Revenue were held inapplicable on the facts, and the conclusion was supported by the cited Tribunal precedent allowing credit of excess duty in similar circumstances.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to take credit of the excess duty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where excess duty payment is disclosed in assessed returns and otherwise evidenced on record, suo motu credit cannot be denied merely for want of separate permission or fresh intimation.