Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods used in the manufacture of an intermediate product, which was captively consumed for producing the final dutiable product, was admissible.
Analysis: The denial of credit was based on the view that the intermediate product was chargeable to nil rate of duty and therefore the capital goods used for its manufacture were not eligible for Modvat credit. The Tribunal held that the issue was already settled in favour of the assessee in an earlier Division Bench decision, which had ruled that the intermediate product was not marketable and therefore not excisable. On that basis, the capital goods used in the process qualified for credit under Rule 57Q, and the credit could be utilised against duty on the final product.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the capital goods was admissible and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an intermediate product is not marketable and is captively consumed in the manufacture of a final dutiable product, capital goods used in that process are eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q.