Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was liable to pay 8% amount under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for not maintaining separate records of common inputs used in the manufacture of dutiable and exempted goods.
Analysis: The assessee had reversed the actual Modvat credit availed on inputs used in exempted products on the basis of its records, and the amount reversed was not in dispute. The controversy was confined to the absence of separate records. Compliance with sub-rule (a) of Rule 57CC was found to exist on the facts.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to pay the 8% amount under Rule 57CC, and the Revenue's contention failed.