Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reversal of proportionate input duty credit before clearance of exempted goods, where common inputs are used for both dutiable and exempted products and separate segregation is not possible, protects the assessee from a demand of 8% of the value of exempted clearances under Rule 57AD of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The dispute concerned nitrogen gas received through pipeline and used commonly for dutiable and non-dutiable lamps, with no practical method of segregation and no separate accounts maintained. The assessee had reversed the proportionate credit attributable to exempted lamps before their clearance. The Tribunal held that the spirit of Rule 57AD is to deny credit relatable to exempted final products, but where the inadmissible credit is reversed before clearance, the effect is the same as non-availment of credit. The Tribunal also noted that the department did not dispute the formula used for reversal and that insisting on 8% of the value of exempted clearances would be unjust in the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The reversal of proportionate credit before clearance was sufficient, and the demand of 8% of the value of exempted clearances was unsustainable. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where common inputs are used for both dutiable and exempted goods and the inadmissible credit attributable to exempted goods is reversed before clearance, the credit is treated as not taken and a separate demand on the value of exempted clearances is not warranted.