Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the duty demand and penalties on pre-stressed concrete girders were sustainable, either because the girders were not goods within the meaning of the Central Excise law or because, even if excisable, they were covered by the exemption notification.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that in the appellants' own earlier matter it had already allowed the appeals, following an earlier decision holding that such girders were not goods within the meaning of the Central Excise Act. It also noted the cited view that fully cast and transported girders could be treated as goods but would nevertheless fall within the scope of Notification No. 59/90-C.E. dated 20-03-1990. On either footing, the duty liability could not survive.
Conclusion: The duty demand and the penalties were set aside and the appeals were allowed.