Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the date on which a cheque for central excise duty is tendered to the Government's banker is to be treated as the date of payment of duty when the cheque is later cleared, and whether penalty was sustainable on the alleged delay.
Analysis: The duty amounts had been paid by cheque and the cheque was presented to the Government's banker on the due date, with clearance on the next day. The reasoning accepted that, where a cheque is tendered and is not dishonoured, payment is deemed to have been made on the date of tender, as supported by the cited decisions and the Central Government account rules. The contrary authority concerning the fortnightly payment scheme was held inapplicable because the payments in question were not made under that scheme. Once no delay in payment was found, the basis for penalty disappeared.
Conclusion: There was no delay in payment of duty. The penalty was not sustainable and was vacated.