Central Excise valuation dispute: partial pre-deposit relief granted as valuation rules were held prima facie applicable.

The Tribunal took a prima facie view that the Central Excise Valuation Rules applied to determine the assessable value of goods cleared by a 100% EOU through a consignment agent, and that valuation under Section 14 of the Customs Act was not established at that stage. It left open the issue of deductions for freight, octroi and similar charges for later consideration. On that basis, complete waiver of pre-deposit was not warranted, and only partial relief was granted by requiring deposit of part of the duty demand while staying the balance of duty and penalty subject to compliance.

---

---

Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was to be granted in full, and whether the applicability of the Central Excise Valuation Rules and the deduction claims raised by the appellant warranted complete stay.

Analysis: The Tribunal formed a prima facie view that the Central Excise Valuation Rules were applicable for determining the assessable value of goods cleared by the 100% EOU through the consignment agent, and that valuation under Section 14 of the Customs Act was not made out at that stage. At the same time, the Tribunal kept open the question relating to allowances for freight, octroi and similar deductions for consideration at a later stage. On that basis, complete waiver of the duty pre-deposit was not justified.

Conclusion: The application for waiver of pre-deposit was not allowed in full and only partial relief was granted by directing deposit of a portion of the duty demand, with the balance of duty and penalty stayed on compliance.

---