Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on glass bottles and other inputs lying in stock on 1-4-2000 when the benefit of Cenvat credit for aerated waters was extended with effect from that date.
Analysis: The notification effective from 31-3-2000 permitted Cenvat credit only in respect of inputs or capital goods received in the factory on or after 1-4-2000. It did not grant retrospective credit for inputs already lying in stock. Applying the earlier decision on the identical question, the Tribunal held that the restriction on receipt of inputs in the factory after 1-4-2000 governed admissibility and the credit could not be availed for stock already in hand on that date.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the glass bottles and other inputs lying in stock on 1-4-2000 was not admissible, and the appeal failed.