Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit on plastic crates and glass bottles lying in balance as on 1-4-2000 was admissible in view of the Board circular and the transitional credit scheme.
Analysis: The Commissioner (Appeals) had relied upon the Board's clarification that where inputs had been received in the factory on or before 31-3-2000 but credit had not been taken for some reason, the credit was nevertheless earned and could be availed under the transitional provision. The Tribunal held that the circular was binding on the departmental authorities and that the goods were duty paid, receipt was not in dispute, and there was no material to show any mala fide or irregular availment. In those circumstances, denial of credit would defeat the scheme and the clarification issued by the Board.
Conclusion: The credit was admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected and the order allowing CENVAT credit, interest relief, and consequential setting aside of penalty was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A binding Board circular granting transitional credit to duty-paid inputs received before the cut-off date must be followed by the authorities, and credit cannot be denied merely for procedural non-compliance in the absence of mala fides.