Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the department could sustain reclassification on a factual basis not set out in the notice and raise a new ground at the appellate stage.
Analysis: An assessee facing a duty demand must be told not only the provision of law invoked but also the facts said to constitute the contravention. A notice cannot remain vague on the manner of alleged breach and then be expanded later by introducing a fresh factual foundation at the appellate stage, even if the broad legal basis for classification remains the same. The assessee had been called upon to meet a case that was not originally made out in the notice.
Conclusion: The new ground could not be introduced at the appellate stage, and the department's appeal was not maintainable.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded, and the order under challenge was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: A duty demand or classification dispute cannot be sustained on a factual basis not specifically set out in the show cause notice; a fresh case cannot be introduced later at the appellate stage.