Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit on capital goods was deniable under Rule 57R(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 when the same machines were used for manufacture of both exempt goods and dutiable goods.
Analysis: The capital goods were used not only for manufacture of labels and badges chargeable to nil duty, but also for production of laces cleared on payment of duty. The condition in Rule 57R(1) denying credit applies only where capital goods are used exclusively for manufacture of goods exempt from duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The later amendment inserting the word "exclusively" confirmed that mixed use for dutiable and exempt goods does not attract the bar.
Conclusion: The restriction under Rule 57R(1) did not apply, and credit on the capital goods was admissible to the assessee.