Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods was admissible when taken before the machinery was installed in the factory, having regard to sub-rule 7 of Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The relevant version of Rule 57Q, as recast by Notification No. 6/97-C.E. (N.T.) dated 01.03.1997, made installation of the capital goods a mandatory precondition for availing credit. On the record, the machinery was not shown to have been in an installed condition on the date credit was taken, and the materials relied on by the assessee did not establish prior installation. As the statutory condition was not satisfied, the credit could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The Modvat credit was not admissible to the assessee and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the governing rule makes installation of capital goods a mandatory prerequisite, credit cannot be taken before such installation is established.