Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appointment of a person as an agent of a non-resident under section 43 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 for one assessment year authorises the Income-tax Officer to treat that person as agent for a subsequent assessment year and demand advance tax under section 18A for that later year without a fresh notice, hearing, and order under section 43.
Analysis: The appointment under section 43 is confined to the assessment year for which it is made. The scheme of the Act treats each assessment year as self-contained, and the vicarious liability of an agent does not automatically carry over to another assessment year. The expression "for all purposes" in section 43 operates only within the assessment year in respect of which the appointment is made, including imposition, quantification, and recovery of tax for that year. Advance tax under section 18A, though collected during the financial year, is imposed in relation to the tax liability of the subsequent assessment year. In the absence of a fresh notice, opportunity of hearing, and order under section 43 for the later assessment year, the person cannot be treated as the statutory agent for that year.
Conclusion: The demand for advance tax for the subsequent assessment year, treating the respondent as agent without a fresh appointment under section 43, was invalid. The notices were rightly quashed, and the appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory agency appointment under section 43 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 is assessment-year specific and cannot be used to impose liability for a different assessment year unless a fresh statutory appointment is made after notice and hearing.