Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appointment of a person as a statutory agent under section 43 for one assessment year continued to authorise a demand for advance tax for a subsequent assessment year without a fresh order under section 43.
Analysis: Section 43 creates a vicarious liability only for the assessment year for which the appointment is made, and the assessment under the Act is self-contained for each year. The expression "for all purposes" in section 43 extends only to the incidents of that particular assessment, including levy and recovery of tax for that year, and does not carry the agency into a different assessment year. Advance tax under section 18A may be collected during the financial year, but it is attributable to the tax liability of the subsequent assessment year. In the absence of a fresh and valid appointment under section 43 for the relevant year, the demand for advance tax from the petitioners as agents of the non-resident firms could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The demand notices were illegal, void, and without jurisdiction, and the petitioners succeeded in challenging them.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory agency under section 43 of the Indian Income-tax Act is confined to the specific assessment year for which it is valid, and it cannot be used to impose advance-tax liability for a subsequent year unless a fresh appointment is made for that year.